Cristina Kirchner: Her sentence is not final and she could be a candidate again | RTVC News
Published By Desantos Rocky | Nov 14, 2024 10:58 a.m.
Note Descr: Cristina Kirchner maintains the possibility of being a legislative candidate, since her conviction is not final and will be appealed before the Supreme Court of Justice....
Cristina Kirchner maintains the possibility of being a candidate in 2024, since her conviction is not final and will be appealed before the Supreme Court of Justice.
The legal situation of former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner continues at the center of the judicial debate and politician in Argentina. The Federal Court of Criminal Cassation ratified a sentence against him that includes six years in prison and perpetual disqualification from holding public office, for alleged fraudulent administration in public works in Santa Cruz. However, this decision is not final, since it will be appealed before the Supreme Court of Justice, which gives Kirchner an opportunity to run in next year's elections. As established by the Federal Criminal Procedure Code since 2021, the sentences are not enforceable until the sentence becomes final, that is, until all judicial instances have been exhausted and it is ratified by the Supreme Court, the last legal authority in the country. As there is no final sentence, Cristina Kirchner not only avoids serving the prison sentence, but also keeps intact her possibility of participating in national politics. You may be interested: “Impunity does not lead us, but to more violence.” , President Petro rejects Santiago Uribe's acquittal10-day period for appealIn addition, Argentine regulations allow those convicted of crimes in cases of advanced age—over 70 years, as is his case—to request house arrest, which rules out, even In the scenario of a final sentence, the possibility that Kirchner will be sent to a common prison. The judicial process in this case is still far from concluded. With the Cassation ruling against, Kirchner's defense has a period of 10 days to appeal to the Supreme Court. This court does not have specific deadlines to issue a resolution, which leaves the time in which the former president's situation will be resolved in suspense. The Court has taken years to rule on important cases, so it would not be strange for the process to be extended, allowing Kirchner to remain active in politics during that period. Also read: Cristina Fernández de Kirchner will present an appeal against her six-year sentence. years in ArgentinaKirchner could be a candidate in the next legislative elections. Cristina Kirchner's case is particular due to the characteristics of the Argentine judicial system and the political context. As long as the Court does not rule definitively, Kirchner does not face legal restrictions to run in next year's legislative elections, a possibility that his followers view favorably. Since assuming the presidency of the Justicialist Party (PJ), Kirchner has established herself as one of the most important political leaders in the country, and any candidacy of hers would mobilize massive support in popular sectors and supporters of Peronism. It should be noted that the former president She has been a controversial figure and has repeatedly denounced that the accusations against her are part of political persecution, a speech that resonates with an important part of Argentine society that sees her as a defender of the social and economic rights of vulnerable sectors. This support remains firm, despite the judicial processes, and a possible candidacy of Kirchner could strengthen his position and challenge those who seek to limit his influence. Don't miss: Who is Marco Rubio, a senator of Hispanic origin who is emerging as Trump's Secretary of State? The ruling of the Court of Cassation also included an order for the confiscation of assets of more than 84 billion pesos, a measure that will not be executed until the sentence becomes final. Unlike other defendants in this case, Kirchner does not have parliamentary jurisdiction to protect her from possible arrest, although the defense has emphasized that there are no elements that justify such a measure, given that the courts did not consider that there were risks of escape or obstruction. of justice.